but why would you include your partitioning characteristics in the aggregate? they're already "filtered" in the SPO, right?
I was worried that if FISCVARNT was a fixed filter in the query but not added to the aggregated, that the aggregate wouldn't be hit. My first test seemed to suggest this, but i guess i did something wrong because i made a simple query (with fiscvarnt) & aggr (without fiscvarnt) and it did hit the aggregate.
Not sure though if this works because it is partitioning char or because it is defined as a constant in my SPO.
Still a shame that you can't define it on the SPO, so i logged an idea for it. Feel free to upvote it :-)